Wednesday, January 17, 2007

Not too far off the mark, or Tonkless

While I joked in the last post that the target audience of Admissibility of Logical Inference Rules was not philosophers because there wasn't enough prose, I found a more serious reason to think this. Apart from the bit in the introduction about being for computer science students, there is no entry for 'tonk' in the index and neither Prior's paper nor Belnap's response are in the bibliography. Tragic!

No comments: